Sticky Your Rig's Benchmark Scores

Discussion in 'Gaming and Benchmarks' started by Force Flow, Oct 9, 2005.

  1. David M

    David M Techphile.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay
    3DMark 06
    System score, 22292
    CPU score at 3.374 GHz, 5677
     
  2. Jbc223456

    Jbc223456

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Messages:
    951
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    12203.79 3DMarks ... Only used trial version of 3DMark.
     
  3. renowilliams

    renowilliams

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    160
    Location:
    Canada
    I have the same cpu as you but clocked to 3.8GHZ and my superpi at 1 million is 10.9 sec
     
  4. birddog_61

    birddog_61

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Graham, TX
    I just ran superPI for the first time, I have my 875k clocked to 3.86Ghz at the moment.

    1M mark in 10.61 seconds
     
  5. henry9419

    henry9419

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    im running an amd phenom II X4 @ stock 3.2GHz and got 22seconds for 1m in super pi...is that good? what is a good program for overclocking and checking stability for cpu gpu and ram?
     
  6. SARGE

    SARGE The Preacher Man

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    7,536
    Location:
    Texas
    When I take mine out of the wrapper and assemble, you already know it wins. :)
     
  7. David M

    David M Techphile.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay
    I just ran 3D Mark Vantage 1.1.0.0 with the rig in my signature. My score was 33214.

    The CPU was running at 4.4GHz with the graphics cards at their factory speeds.

    My 3DMark06 score is 31076.

    My previous 3DMark06 score was 22292. Since then I have replaced my motherboard with one that has 16 graphics lanes per PCIe slot. Before I had 8. The number of graphics lanes available per slot is where my computer was bottlenecking.

    I'm going to try reaching 5 Ghz with the CPU and set the card to its other BIOS which overclocks it and then see what scores I get.

    Just thought you guys might be curious what a high end rig scores.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2011
  8. jdeb

    jdeb

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Messages:
    5,924
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    :eek: impressive
     
  9. David M

    David M Techphile.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay
    Unknown to me at the time, Crossfire was not working so the last score of 33214 was from one graphics card.

    New score, P44736 3DMarks with the CPU at 4.7 GHz and stable as tested by Prime95. Both cards BIOS switches were set to overclock. Both cards fans set manually to 100%. The maximum CPU temp was 65C during the benchmark.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2011
  10. Masaki 7-11

    Masaki 7-11

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,358
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Finally finished getting all the parts upgraded on my computer and ran some benches today. Processor is running at 4.2GHz (can't push it anymore without upping voltages and don't want to get my temps above 60C).
    3D Mark 06: 29912
    3D Mark Vantage: P30840
    3D Mark 11: P8491
    Super PI (1M): 8.95s

    Maximum CPU temperature was 60C, my original HD6870 is mildly overclocked to match the factory overclock of my new HIS HD6870 IceQ X Turbo.
     
  11. David M

    David M Techphile.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay
    New score after a little tweaking. 45503 in 3DMark Vantage
     
  12. Masaki 7-11

    Masaki 7-11

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,358
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Have you tried 3DMark11? I'd assume it'd scale better with your graphics as it's more demanding, I've noticed older versions of 3DMark don't scale that well past a certain point.
     
  13. David M

    David M Techphile.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay
    Thanks, I will give it a try.

    It looks like you did well with a 6870. How did you rank with those with near equivalent hardware? My ranking was right in the middle of the curve. I would like to be able to break 50,000 but I have no idea what else I can try other than liquid nitrogen and liquid cooled cards. My CPU air cooler seems to rank better than most liquid coolers.

    Graphics card scaling is not proportional to cost. It is nowhere near. My guess is my scores are being held back by the number of graphics lanes. The Revolution board does not have 2 x 16 true graphics lanes. No board does until PCIe3 is available with Ivy Bridge. I guess they will become available at the same time?...Q2 of 2012 is what I read somewhere. It will be interesting to see how many true graphics lanes are available then.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2011
  14. Masaki 7-11

    Masaki 7-11

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,358
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    My ranking with the HD6870s was the next bar past the middle of the pack, probably because I have slightly overclocked cards. I could probably increase my score a little by overclocking my CPU more (or my video cards for that matter), but I have a "silent case" with sound-dampening foam on the sides and few areas where air can flow through, so I can't really handle bigger temperatures than I have now and remain at a comfortable level (CPU goes to 59-60C during 1Hr of Prime 95 with 8 threads) and Video Cards stay in the low 70Cs.

    I think Intel made the Sandy Bridge (LGA1155) socket have reduced PCIe lanes (only 16 from what i've read) to make it less viable for High End multi-gpu configurations so that their X58 platform (LGA 1366) would still be a viable choice, given that most Sandy Bridge processors are on par or above LGA 1366 processors for lower price.

    I think with the new X79 platform, they will have true 2 x 16 lanes (perhaps even PCIe 3.0, though I've read that initially it may only be PCIe 2.0), so that should work out quite well for High-End multi-gpu configurations.

    From what I've read my HD6870s pretty much fully use 8x 2.0 lanes and are a little bottlenecked by it (saw some benchmarks where moving from 8x to 16x increased performance by a few percent), so I'd imagine the cards you have right now would run a fair bit faster if they had more bandwidth available.
     
  15. XxKRazykidxX

    XxKRazykidxX

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    206
    where does one find these benchmarking programs?
     
  16. glc

    glc Forum Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2000
    Messages:
    35,205
    Location:
    Joplin MO
  17. XxKRazykidxX

    XxKRazykidxX

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    206
  18. XxKRazykidxX

    XxKRazykidxX

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    206
    Specs should be in my sig.
    Also, O.O i think this is bad, but im not good at reading benchmarks yet. NVIDIA GeForce 6800. >..> proves i need a better GPU

    3DMark06
     
  19. Zee_33

    Zee_33

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    9
  20. birddog_61

    birddog_61

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Graham, TX
    Just remembered this thread.

    I tested SuperPI on my [email protected] and ended up with.
    1M in 8.08 seconds, so the single threaded performance of the newer i5 is a lot faster than the older i7.

    Here is my Firestrike score with my 670's



    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i5-3570K Processor,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. P8Z77-V LK